As dictated into text in 10 min, by Peter Joseph
On September 11th 2001, I woke up a bit late for work. Living in Brooklyn, I hopped the train to midtown to humor my job as an artistic director for a team of corporate media video editors. Blasting some flavor of polymetric Nordic death metal in my headphones, a morning ritual to assist my burgeoning caffeine habit, I bounced along my subway transfers, never noticing why the train kept starting and stopping more than usual. By the time I reached midtown, it was about 9:15 and rather than run to my job, now 15 min late, I decided, as usual, food was more of a priority. So, I popped into my fav bagel shop and noticed something was off. Finally removing my headphones, I inquired as to the strange mass behavior I was feeling. My buddy behind the counter, someone I had seen almost everyday for 2 years, looked at me and said coldly “You have had your headphone on. Two planes. Each crashed into the twin towers.”
Walking back outside, the temperament of things changed dramatically as my perception opened. The vast rush hour masses had a tension I can still feel. Something that can only be felt not described. Entering the office was equally as strange. My co-worker and friend Scott (who coincidentally ended up being the “man on the street” for Culture In Decline over a decade later) was in rare form. He said to me “Dude! They just hit the pentagon! There is no other symbolic strike that could ever show such an act of war!” This was true. His father also worked at the Pentagon so there was a deeper meaning to that observation. Luckily his father wasn’t harmed.
Being dismissed from work early, Scott and another co-worker and I went to his apartment. By that time, the city was almost a ghost town. After phone calls with family, we all sat back and watched the news as the vast majority did. And my memory of that experience alone was surreal. While I admit the stress of the circumstance brought out the whisky, the nature of the news that day was overwhelming. I think we watched those planes enter those towers 500 times in a few hours. Over and Over. The news was just a loop, in effect. It was like a kind of cult or religious programming – endless repetition of images to be associated. Explosions, collapsing towers, bin Laden, Islam, various “terrorist” b-roll highlighting the Middle East; peppered with the incredible suffering and heart break of the families and victims of the event. To me – and to the nation at large – these images would never be separated again. It was an emotionally induced trauma; a sociological effect comparable to mass PTSD.
As the years went by, my basic sense of religious contempt was only inflamed. I was perfectly happy to believe that a set of extremists, praising their invisible man in the sky, conjured up a plan to harm the “evil empire”. I really didn’t give it a 2nd thought until about 5 years later when I saw footage of World Trade Center 7. Since I had never heard of WTC7 until 2006, it baffled the intuition that a nearly 50 story building, located a city block away from the twin towers, could quite suddenly collapse into its own footprint at free fall speed. Having always enjoyed physics and math in school, nothing about this was right, especially the corroborating testimony of people who were inside WTC7 who experienced pre-weakening explosions first hand. Even the official NIST report never explained how the collapse occurred, despite its closed black-box model that magically made it all work in a computer. And from that moment, the flood gates opened with not a few discrepancies regarding the Official Story – but hundreds.
But! I’m not here to explore the vast evidence that links 9/11 to internal corruption and collusion within the United States Government. Yes, we could talk about the weeks of extreme high temperatures coming from under collapsed WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7 that could be seen via thermal imagery from satellite — temperatures that were simply impossible on their own, corroborated by the numerous fire department eye witnesses that describe pools of liquid or molten steel in the basements. Yes, we could talk about the multi-corroborated testimony from various workers in the sub-basements of WTC1 and WTC2 who experienced mass explosions there — moments before the planes even hit the top of the towers; the same explosions that blew out the windows of the building lobbies on the first floor. Yes, we could talk about NORAD and the FAA and the numerous war games going on the same day, some of which involved planes being flown into buildings, causing apparent confusion as fighter jets were scrambled in the complete wrong direction. A failure of commercial interception that has never happened in US history.
Yes, we could talk about how most of the hijackers had been under FBA surveillance for years, with two of them actually living with an FBI informant. Yes, we could talk about the 100+ warnings sent from all over the world that an attack on US soil, possibly the WTC, was looming while the Bush admin looked the other way. The words “it will be spectacular” was used months before by the CIA. Yes, we could talk about how it took over a year and with perpetual pressure from the victims’ families to have any investigation at all – resulting in perhaps one of the most underfunded inquiries to date; only to produce the 911 Commission (Omission) Report where, today, the heads admit their efforts were stifled at every turn and the report is heavily whitewashed. And Yes – we could also talk about how the events of 9/11 have set course for criminal Western military invasions and imperialism with systemic chain reactions that continue to throw a net of hegemonic oppression, death and destruction over the planet – including the creation of what has now become real, true terrorism in the form of IS and so on.
Yes — We could talk about alot of things.
But I’m not. 😉
Instead, I am going to use this 15th anniversary of 9/11 to talk about the most important thing I learned from the event and that is the power of social psychology. To whatever degree you disagree with the Official US Conspiracy Theory, you will find that the discussion is long closed and the stamp of religious sanctity has made the event untouchable. It is now a codified religious myth and there are severe consequences to those who dare express an alternative position. “Heretic” is perhaps the best term for it.
It is an unfortunate evolutionary fact that human beings are prone to seeking acceptance into their community or group rather than suffer the isolation and ostracism that comes with taking an unpopular position. This is compounded by the need to uphold a reputation, something also related to gaining income in this society. People will justify all sorts of things to maintain an image to secure income, even if it means suppressing their beliefs. I can’t tell you how many friends who were outspoken in demanding a real, independent investigation of 9/11 lost their jobs and were alienated from friends and family. Some were sent into massive depressions with dark results.
The herd mentality has a powerful effect in terms of what is called “social identity theory”. Social identity theory points out that we are ultimately defined by the people around us, particularly the groups we identify with. In this, deviation from the group consensus is destabilizing. In the 1950s, a study asking a group of people to make simple decisions about visual images, such as which line on a screen was the longest of a set. However, all but one test subject was in on the study. These other participants were fakes, planted to purposely agree on the wrong answer and encourage the test subject to go along with their group decision about the correct match. The controlled study proved a strong effect of peer pressure, with over 75 percent of the participants in the total of 12 repeated tests conforming at least once. This is in contrast to the control group (no pressure to conform) where less than 1 percent conformed. This propensity to favor group loyalty, bypassing critical, independent thought is widespread and it works on the personal level or the mass social level.
Neurobiologist Vasily Klucharev writes that “the deviation of individual opinion from the group behavior (opinions) is interpreted by the nervous system as behavioral error or ’reward prediction error’, which starts the process of behavior change, based on the dopaminergic mechanism of reinforcement learning.” In other words, our very brains are somewhat trapped between rational thinking and impulsive counter reactions that seek to prefer in-group conclusions. We experience pain otherwise. These lower brain reactions can make us vulnerable to numerous thoughtless behaviors triggered by brain chemistry, and in addition make us susceptible to external manipulation. Our emotions can literally “change our mind” when the pressure is high enough, given the power of the subconscious mind.
The point being, since 9/11 the power of this gravitation toward group identity/inclusion has been made strongly apparent. Today, I’m hard pressed to find any average person willing to have a rational conversation on the countless problems with the US governments story of 9/11. The emotional dissonance is simply to hard for them, especially since the barometer of the zeitgeist – the mainstream media – has condemned any such discussion with vast pejoratives, derision and mockery. This is no different in phenomenology than the group gravitations in presidential elections, as we see the masses fall victim to today. The undertone of wanting to be on the “winning” side of such a contest, quickly pulls people in due to these same propensities for social inclusion.
So, as much as we like to think humanity has critical freewill to make proper decisions if properly informed, the truth is we have a sociological group inclusion problem. And this problem fights logic, reason and critical thought. I wish I had a simple answer to resolve it, particularly with respect to the dire need for a social revolution. But until a kind of grand galvanization is created – one focused and consistent in its targets and methods, we cannot expect much change given this looming sociological imposition. The tipping point can only occur through critical mass; A mass large enough to attract enough people to override this fatal evolutionary flaw. I am convinced that this basic irrational propensity, compounded by our social system, is exactly what stops what should be a natural, progressive move into improved social affairs by humanity.
That is the most important thing I learned from 9/11 and it has changed the way I engage the world as an activist. That said, I will conclude by making one other observation.
While the problem of the “bandwagon” is bad enough, 9/11 fundamentally promotes “in-group” and “out-group” bigotry. This annual ritual we have to remind ourselves of how “we” were “attacked” does nothing but inflame the irrational. People say to me “don’t you feel for the families of 9/11?” I say yes- but no more than the 1 poor child who dies every 5 seconds from poverty and inequality. And this annual event isn’t about the families or victims anyway. It is about American exceptionalism.
My sympathy is not driven by this illusion of group identity we have fostered in the US or the Western world in general. There are no exceptions. It is a miserably immature reality that just because the event was molded by malice and was executed in a spectacularly criminal, Hollywood film-like way, that the citizens of the United States now blindly recite their religious catch phrase of “we will never forget”. The very phrase is draped in vindictive-ness and elitism.
And this applies to all nations or groups that hold up their “personal atrocities” as some reminder of their plight or current exceptionalism.
On that level, I want nothing more than to forget.
Not one real solution. Any project called the “Global Solutions Program” that actual thinks entrepreneurialism is still a means to an end is delusional at this stage. When will the techno-capitalist apologists grow up and see that the mechanics of the economic system that brings these new ideas to light is the same system that created the need for most of those “solutions”?
1) “Microbial engineering to solve micro-nutrition deficiency”? OK. But why not just streamline current food allocation since we produce more than enough and have the capacity for vast improvement? Is a portable bioreactor really needed?
2) “Affordable access to refrigeration for all” What is this 1900? How long has it been since the Western world made refrigeration ubiquitous and extra low cost? You mean to tell me the cost of this old, simple tech now needs advanced thermoelectric technology to lower the price so the poor of the world can have access? While I admire any and all advancement in efficiency, this is just bizarre given there is no reason to think such advancement is a “game changer” for refrigeration affordability. Refrigeration overall hasn’t been cost prohibitive in decades and to assume even lower costs is the answer is to side-step the main problem: which is again inhumane class imbalance and the social system that perpetuates it.
3) “Pet genetics for improving human drug targeting” Now this just screams elitist/abstract scientific pontification; detached from any sense of human/social priority. Like Richard Branson thinking that trying to make consumer flights to space is a public service. But I cant wait to get my “genetic testing kit for household cats”! And any research centric on genes without an equal focus on environmental influences is almost a waste of time, especially in terms of public health.
4) “Energy distribution by beaming solar energy through space” Sounds cool. But guess what: not needed. What is needed is a shift in renewable energy harnessing with existing means in a systems approach (see The Zeitgeist Movement Defined). Where is a project to create mixed-use baseload/localized harnessing systems to improve what we already have? Why is that ignored?
5) “Artificial intelligence to solve technological unemployment” And this made my jaw drop. “…helping customers learn about their career purpose and their current occupation’s resiliency to technological unemployment.” WTF? Of course, if it was true AI – all it would say is : “You humans don’t need jobs. Why did you invent me to help organize what is an obsolete social arrangement?”
by Preston James, Ph.D May 16, 2016
Full disclosure of these deep, dark secrets is now well underway and is in process of completely disempowering the Khazarian Mafia, its Establishment Hierarchy and their evil Globalist NWO Agenda.
This is a long article and you can read the bold print and the conclusion to save time and get a pretty good idea of its main claims. This article is quite esoteric in nature and is solely based on the personal opinions, views and field research of the author. This article is based on personal interviews and participant-observation fieldwork over a 30 year period with numerous Intel and LE individuals not associated with VT in any way.
I would rather not believe any of what I propose in this article is true. But I have seen far too much hard evidence provided to me by well qualified, experienced others and have seen too much actual evidence firsthand to doubt the conclusions I propose in this article. I have worked with federal whistleblowers who were bucking the Establishment Hierarchy who have been without question harassed by actual alien ETs (and for which there has been supporting evidence of such Alien ET presences).
Thus, it makes sense to me to now assume that there is a connection between the Select Few Establishment Hierarchy (EH) controllers who sit at the top of the pyramidal EH of the Khazarian Mafia (KM), the world’s largest organized crime syndicate.
This EH/KM is run by the “Select Few”, the unimaginably evil and criminally insane, soulless, pure psychopaths who call the shots on behalf of the EH/KM and start wars to generate mass death and mass human suffering of innocents, who run Satanic pedophile ops and child ritual sacrifices, all done in order to perpetuate their reigns of secret terror and to empower themselves in order to gain massive riches and status, and to make major progress in attaining their evil age-old, inter-generational Globalist NWO Agenda.
Unless you are up to speed and well informed about the Secret Space War, the Secret Shadow Government (SSG), the Khazarian Mafia (KM) and its stateside Establishment Hierarchy (EH), you would probably be wasting your time reading it. Without that background it is unlikely to fit into your head!
Please be forewarned that this article is highly controversial and may be deemed somewhat offensive to some who profoundly disagree with its assumptions and conclusions. My thanks and gratitude to the top Directors of VT for allowing this kind of controversial article. Do not assume any of them necessarily agree with the content provided below and to those living and deceased (most are deceased now) who provided much of this information and evidence to me over the last 30 years.
There are some very deep dark secrets behind the evil Globalist NWO Agenda that the Khazarian Mafia Kingpins have been trying to attain over at least the last 1,000 years.
Since the average lifespan of the “Select Few” Kingpins that sit at the top of the KM Hierarchy is no longer than most oldest humans (usually no more than 80-100 years), we know that something else is at play here.
Mike Harris, VT Financial Editor and VT Talk Show Host (Short End of the Stick) has stated a number of times, some inter-generational entity that lives hundreds of years seems to be involved here directing this evil agenda.
How else can this inter-generational continuity of mission be occurring with so much consistency?
I have called this inter-generational entity in the past the Third Force, a non-human incredibly evil force working through specially chosen human “bloodline” families. More on that later with a description of the First, Second, Third and Fourth forces and how they operate one against the other.
And if there is a Third Force directing and managing this progressive roll-out of this Globalist Alien ET Agenda as it seems, this would mean that this entity has pretty advanced power to effectively direct this evil Globalist NWO Agenda.
And we now know for certain that this is an unimaginably evil agenda of pedophilia, child torture and child sacrifice, child vivisection, human parasitism of a wide variety, inflicted mass illness and suffering on humans all over the world, mass-murder through high tech eugenics, and engineered wars on humans over many generations.
Without some non-human external entity directing the evil, soulless Select Few, it seems impossible for the Bloodline Families to be able to maintain such a well-organized long term plan of many hundreds of years.
And it certainly appears that this non-human entity is behind an age-old, inter-generational plan to centralize all governments into a One-World System that serves the special needs of the Select Few Khazarian Mafioso while providing them unbridled power to asset strip, disable and destroy so many millions of innocent humans as they relish doing.
It should now be obvious to most who consider these realities that the Select few and their Establishment Hierarchy (EH) subordinates have lost their human souls, that is, if they even had one in the first place.
These evil folks act as criminally insane psychopaths with no human conscience or sympathy for others, much like pure sociopaths who frontal lobes are shrunken or damaged to the point they cannot empathize with the suffering of others.
The ability of the Globalist NWO folks to consolidate all major industries, Intel and Law Enforcement in America is now a well established fact that is easily observable.
This has course been done by the Establishment Hierarchy to centralize their power and take control away from states, communities and We The People.
Such long term inter-generational efforts show great genius, craftiness and a sophisticated understanding of human mass psychology and mind-kontrol methodologies and an ability to deploy them effectively.
The First Force is the basic self-interests of We The People to preserve our Republic form of government, and protect our basic institutions while guarding our basic family heritage of character and morality.
The Second Force is the the evil would-be tyrants who are actually soulless, two-face criminal sociopaths who put on a false-face of so-called public service while they harbor an unimaginably criminally insane pure psychopathic evil inner nature which directs them to do any evil they can get away with in secret in order to acquire power and seize the reign of government for their own evil purposes. The Second Force at present and for at least the last 1,000 years has been the Khazarian Mafia (KM).
The Third Force is the source of all evil in the universe that itself is very crafty and remarkably two-faced. He presents himself as an angel of light and enlightenment when he stands for just the opposite, ultimate evil. The Third Force is Lucifer (Satan, the highest ranking “Fallen One”).
The Fourth Force is the source of all original life, goodness, love, morality, ethics, loyalty, character and the Golden rule to love your neighbor as yourself and treat others the way you want to be treated. The Fourth Force is God Almighty, the Supreme Creator of the Universe who is the only eternal power.
There are Ten deep, dark secrets of the establishment Hierarchy (EH) and some others that they themselves remain hidden from even them.
- The First deep, dark secret of the Establishment Hierarchy (EH) is that it’s top leaders, the Select Few, gain energy and power from the dark side through human compromise operations (most often pedophile honey traps) and are able to quite effectively coerce, blackmail elected and appointed officials, and large corporate Directors into doing their will which is usually anti-America, anti-human, and unimaginably evil.
We now know for certain that the Establishment Hierarchy is the stateside franchise of the Khazarian Mafia (aka World Zionists, Babylonian Talmudic Tribalists, the Process Satanic pedophile network, the Illuminati, the Secret society and High Freemasonry hidden network, all different names for this world’s largest, most evil organized crime syndicate.
And yes, the KM is the largest RICO crime syndicate ever to plague America, far surpassing the “Black Hand” and even the Cosa-Nostra, neither of which used pedophilia and child sacrifice to gain power from the Darkside like the Establishment Hierarchy of the KM.
If this first deep, dark secret of the EH’s massive human compromise operations on a continuing every day basis was ever believed and accepted as the absolute fact that it is, the American people would rise up and hunt down and destroy these perps one way or another.
The problem is that the American public has been mind-kontrol by the Controlled Major Mass Media (CMMM) including KM television programming and sophisticated NWO, Globalist Luciferian programming in the public schools and public institutions of higher learning for the last 50 years and are not able to believe something is accepted truth unless it is “christened” as such by the CMMM.
- The Second deep, dark secret of the EH is that it’s top leaders, the Select Few, gain energy and power from murdering young infants and children through satanic rituals based on child torture, child sacrifice that are so evil and gross it would not be appropriate to describe them here.
Any Establishment Hierarchy perp exposed publicly for doing this by well-validated, credible videos that provided their sure and easy identification would result in an immediate crazed public reaction and motivated public actions to hunt these perps down and destroy them as an exercise in unmitigated vigilante law.
It is difficult for the American Public to ever learn about this and accept it as actual fact because of the massive lock created over the American Mass Mind by the CMMM and the public schools system run out of DC by Globalist NWO agents for the Establishment Hierarchy.
Make no mistake about it, the reason Hollywood actors are paid so much is because of their immense value to the EH for instilling Babylonian Talmudic values in the American Masses subconscious group minds, which helps justify the Tribalists’ morally compromised lifestyles and keeps the American masses from ever rising up against them to end their reign of occupation and terror once and for all.
The EH has always taken great efforts to bring in drugs, push perversity and amorality in order to dirty up the American masses. This creates cover for their evil lifestyles, asset stripping and hijacking of America from We The People.
It’s difficult for any populace which the EH has mired up in Babylonian Talmudic prescribed evil, sin and rot to morally object to the evil but lavish EH lifestyles that allow EH to live in extreme luxury by parasitizing the American working men and women. These average Americans actually work for a living rather than scam, lie, cheat and asset strip others to gain their vast fortunes and power like the Select Few and their EH puppets do.
- The Third deep, dark secret of the EH is that it is being personally “anointed”, empowered and directed by what high level insiders refer to as the “Third Force”.
This Third Force has been described in various different ways, always in mystical and supernatural terms as a powerful supra-human Force which exercise extreme Psi-power deployed through its Select Few “EH servants” who run the EH on its behalf.
After studying this force and tangling with it for many years I am now pretty certain that it is not only evil in nature from the dark side, but that it is now directing its own worldwide secret Luciferian Network that remains hidden in plain sight within High Freemasonry, various associated secret societies and a secret Satanic Pedophile network specializing in child sacrifice and many acts far to evil to present here.
These EH/KM Satanic rituals are always “Dual use”.
That is they are used for both pedophile and associated child sacrifice producing instant adrenaline highs for their own personal kicks and for human compromise operations as well. Detailed descriptions of these unimaginably evil acts can in some cases send susceptible readers into PTSD relapses so it is not appropriate to get too specific here.
Not only do many of the first participants in these ritual understand they are Satanic in nature, but they do not understand they are giving up their very souls for participating and opening themselves up to possession by a Third Force entity. This Third Force entity desires to use them, but has no loyalty or love for them. It provides access to incredible rewards when they reach a certain point in their progressively higher, more evil initiations.
At such a point an entity appears to them personally and offers them all the riches, power, and status they could ever want if they will sell their soul. When they do this and begin to receive what was offered as promised by this entity, they receive their own spirit guide that appears to them in secret and serves as their operational consigliere (counselor).
What they are not told is that this entity will discard them and toss them on the trashpile of history in a NY minute once they are no longer needed.
Not only is this account which has been provided by several good sources independent of each far to incredulous for the average person, it is something I have difficulty believing even though I now know it is actually true.
Even those who work inside unacknowledged special access programs related to the Secret Space War system who know about this often feel denial welling up inside their consciousness which the leads to major cognitive dissonance often followed by feeling of quiet desperation.
- The Fourth deep, dark secret of the EH is that the Secret Shadow Government (SSG) was taken over by the Third Force itself and is used to further it own Globalist NWO Agenda to conform with the one the Third Force has instilled in the top EH controllers, aka the Select Few.
The Secret Shadow Government was set up under the National Security Act of 1947 and 1952 to deal with and contain the Alien ET/crashed UFO matters, the secret treaties with Alien ET groups, the back-engineering of crashed UFOs, and the joint human/ET projects at the Dulce, NM Deep Underground Military Base (DUMB).
At the Dulce DUMB there is an expensive joint effort between a certain Alien ET group to create a cure for their Third Force “created android-type races” whose genetics are decaying rapidly, and joint efforts to synthetic the soul to implant in their own Third Force created species. By the way, these efforts so far have failed and will always be doomed to complete failure, just like all the Third Forces synthesized races.
- The Fifth deep, dark secret of the EH is that the Third Force is actually Lucifer and his Fallen Angels (the Nephilim or the Fallen Ones).
Lucifer (Satan) is the King of the “two-faced” and is only loyal to his minions, his soulless, possessed “servants” as long as they serve a practical need for him in taking down the whole world and setting up his worldwide Luciferian Kingdom. Once the Select Few and their top minions usefulness is diminished, they will all be tossed on the trash pile of history.
As the Khazarian Mafia (KM) is now no longer needed, he will make certain its cover is blown and its sins fully exposed and he (Lucifer) will take it down and provide a more acceptable substitute.
As the KM is now being cornered all over the World and in America too, the Select few and their top Minions and Cutouts are going to become confused and have strong reactions of incredulity at their long deserved exposure and demise.
But anything the KM does to try and resurrect itself an put on a new socially acceptable face will be far too little too late because they will be completely taken apart at the seams.
This will occur as the Third Force abandons them completely and raises up a new power that seems righteous but will be empowered to be the epitome of two-faced evil.
This new power will be able to project a caring public face, while enacting the deepest, darkest covert evil in history which will culminate in the end of the age and the appearance of the Fourth Force which will end the reign of evil of the Third Force.
The Third force is the ultimate evil in all creation but because it is able to craftily disguise itself as enlightenment and light when it is actually covert darkness, death and sophisticated human soul-snatching, it is able to evade recognition for what it is by most.
- The Sixth deep, dark secret of the EH is that the Third Force obtains more and more of its extreme power by snatching human souls (stripping them away from the human host and covertly replacing it with one of his entities) and by stealing one’s life-force through extreme human torture, pain and suffering and murder.
The mass-murder of many innocents in war always based on putting soldiers in a “Kill or be killed” desperate situation is the key to this unrelenting blood shedding and mass human sacrifice.
It is pedophilia and human misery, suffering and human sacrifice that not only empowers the Third Force and his entities (the fallen ones) but also empower the EH recruits and members as they climb into the various successively higher levels of initiation rituals which are too disgusting to detail here.
The Select few are basically living off the life-force of their pedophile and ritual sacrifice victims by feeding the evil entities that possess them, direct them and empower them. The top EH members, especially the Select Few (not just men but a few well know women too) drink their blood after subjecting them to the most pain, trauma and fear imaginable in order to get their hormones secreted in maximum panic.
- The Seventh deep, dark secret of the EH (Select Few only) is that their age-old, inter-generational Globalist NWO is actually the same Evil Agenda of a certain Alien ET group which (the Dracos) which itself is the Third Force Luciferian Agenda which is also the same Agenda of the Hierarchy and the Select Few that run it are so highly committed to attaining.
Yes, This Globalist NWO Agenda is the same actual Agenda of the Third Force (Lucifer). But it is the operational agenda of the Alien ETs (Dracos or Dragons) as well which who take orders from Lucifer himself.
It is important for humans to understand that this Evil Globalist NWO Agenda can only be advanced if certain societal engineering has been successfully attained: Society must be dirtied up to in progressive degrees with crime, drugs, perversity, destruction of genetically defined sex roles, destruction of conventional marriage, destruction of the family; and all this can only be accomplished by the establishment of Neo-Bolshevik Babylonian Talmudic perversions of morality as the acceptable norm. This of course also creates great cover for the extreme evil, sins and crimes against humanity of the Khazarian mafia, and its Select Few.
- The Eighth deep, dark secret of the EH (only the Several Few know and a few researchers who have discovered anecdotal evidence or been provided leaks from secret Space War Program members) is that the Third Force has a number of large psychotronically and psi-tronically “cloaked” spaceships (thus invisible to humans).
These large invisible to us spaceships lie in deep earth orbits and contain hundreds of Alien ET specially bred android-type cipher technicians who monitor humans who give off psychic Psi-signals that come within their defined algorithm parameters.
These Alien ET ciphers continually monitor humans whom they designated as targets and deploy custom psychotronic solutions and psi-power solutions designed to get them back into their desired parameters and on track to lose their souls, so that the Third Force can reach the break point and start descending and onto the Earth surface and walk around freely in total command.
These alien ET ciphers have been reported to have access to a trans-time “lens” that has been labelled the “looking glass”.
This was claimed by Alien ETs working in joint SSG special access, unacknowledged programs to be able to project images from the future, thus providing an ability to preview where certain targets and governments are headed unless psychotronic and psi-tronic efforts are made to intervene. Some insider believe there has been significant evidence to prove beyond any doubt that these devices are faulty and not accurate.
Actually, the Quantum computer algorithm projections for behavioral chains (continuing committed lines of action) are far more accurate when they use complex multivariate analysis and millions of divergent models for projections and gaming each situation using high-speed calculations.
It has also been claimed by various Alien ET “ambassadors” who have established daily or periodic working relationships with certain EH members (of the Select Few) that there are Stargates, naturally occurring as well as advanced ET time machines, that can distort or warp time, or be used to take an entity or human to a different time period or Galaxy. I have no reason to believe or disbelieve this claim, but if true, a Fourth Force has certainly set well-defined rigid “Rules of Play” governing the use of such. Next herein is a description of the Fourth Force.
- The Ninth deep, dark secret of the EH is that there is a God Almighty, the Fourth Force: which is the Supreme Ruler and Creator of all; the eternal “I am” that has the power to control the whole universe and deal with the Third Force whenever so desired, based on His own age-old plan; and has set in place immutable “Rules Of Play” that the Third Force and its minions must obey.
The Fourth Force has imposed and always enforces rigid “Rules of Play” on the Third Force and the EH to which they must conform. The first rule is that the Third Force and the EH must provide informed consent to the masses before they attempt to soul-snatch and subject the populace to more of their age-old inter-generational Globalist NWO Agenda.
Another rule of play is that Alien ET groups, who are actually the synthetic progeny of the Third Force, who are in a constant state of genetic degradation and weird diseases, have been exiled to live underground and habitate different dimensions and time periods, unless personally invited by a nation’s high government officials.
Then certain small numbers of these entities may live and operate in joint projects, which they do. This is why we have had some small numbers of Alien ETs and alien/human hybrids in the Pentagon and even the White House at various times since 1947.
Alien ETs cannot appear in any mass setting like a major city and land their craft and get out or walk among us undisguised because they are prevented by the Fourth Force from doing so by the mandated Rules of Play of the Forth Force.
They will only be able to walk freely among us in their native appearance when a majority of humans have lost their souls to the Third Force by being significantly dirtied up and corrupted. This may be close at hand just based on the breakdown of marriage, the family, sex roles and the endemic corruption at every level of society and all levels of the USG.
I frequently hear the argument attempting to discredit the power of various Alien ET advanced weapons such as particle beams. It goes like this: “well, if Alien ETs were real and there were actually real anti-gravity craft with such unlimited energy sources, certainly they would just land and take over the whole Earth in a matter of mere days!”
The reason they don’t do this is not that they can’t because they don’t have advance weapons systems or extreme zero point energy systems and anti-gravity or even advanced healing methods using special light and frequencies. But it is because the Fourth Force has imposed rigid Rules of Play which prevent this.
If the Alien ETs (actually all are Third Force synthetic android type progressively decaying races) are ever to take over the whole world and walk freely on the surface it will be because they did it by taking the souls of each human, one at a time and reaching a majority where the net desire is to be ruled by the Third Force directly because the masses have been totally deceived by the Third Force, mis-perceiving its extreme darkness as light and enlightenment.
- The Tenth deep, dark secret of the EH is that the Secret Shadow Government (SSG) is engaged in a Secret Space War, in orbital space around Planet Earth, through our galaxy the Milky Way, and in deep space perhaps even into different dimensions.
There have been reliable vetted testimonies from pilots involved who have been employed in these Secret Space War efforts that are conducted with rigid rules of operation, and specific terms and periods of service, after which sophisticated efforts to completely wipe their memories are conducted (by special IV bags with scopolomine/placidyl type hypnotics administered and cerebrally applied psycho-electronics).
These measures sometimes fail as does a lot of the MK-Ultra Fourth Reich BCC trauma-based, soul murder, MPD-type, Candy Jones/Sirhan-Sirhan/John Hinckley type mind-kontrol. Many of the MK-ultras start remembering after 20-30 years as their conditioning breaks down.
With these Secret Space War Pilots, when it fails, it breaks down much faster, typically in a year or less, but even then it is typical to have a laissez-faire attitude about it probably as an artifact of the lifestyle they led and the mind-kontrol they were subject too.
Now here are some of the biggest secrets of all relating to the Alien ET Third Force problem. And these are not known by the EH or its controlling KM criminal Kingpins, the Select Few either.
The biggest secret of all is one that the Third Force is desperate to contain and is one that even the EH and the Select few are not aware of. This is the fact that the Third Force can be beaten by any significant massing of Psi-power of the American people or by the human populace, which likely means a significant segment, maybe even a simple majority.
Some of the EH and some of the Select few realize that they can be taken down if the masses ever come to know for certain what their secret evil initiation rites and secret rituals consist of (Pedophilia, child sacrifice, etc.).
This significant massing of psi-power can easily occur once the truth about what the EH is a front for, the Khazarian mafia, the world’s largest organized crime syndicate which just happens to be the embodiment of the power of the Third Force and its Alien ET entities.
Once the majority of the humans know that the EH is run by Lucifer that has infected them and snatched their souls and that the EH is completely evil and unredeemable, and that it can be brought down by complete exposure of its two-faced lifestyles and evil sins such as pedophilia and child sacrifice, it’s game over.
Abject secrecy of the two-faced nature and unimaginable secret Satanic ritual sins which include the secret pedophilia and child sacrifice of the EH is completely necessary for their continued power and even their continued existence. Without that extreme secrecy, just like the Alien ET’s secrets that they must obey the Fourth Force’s Rules of Play providing informed Human consent, neither the EH nor the Alien ETs can continue to roll out their evil Globalist NWO Agenda, nor even continue to exist tampering with human societies at all.
That is why the EH has sunk so many millions into their CMMM, Hollywood, the public schools and sport (bread and circuses. This is to keep people mind-kontrolled and lead them away from the truth and keep them too busy and distracted to think about the truly important matters in life so that they can arm themselves with basic morality, decency and the truth about Babylonian Talmudism, Bolshevism and NeoBolshevism, the PNACers, the top NeoCons and the Establishment Hierarchy’s intersection with Satanic evil and the “selling of their souls” to receive power, riches and fame.
Evil can have no hold on society if most members of society practice the Golden Rule of the Fourth Force, that is, to love thy neighbor as thyself, or treat others the way you want to be treated. It’s like the adage expressed in the old movies the “Flim Flam Man” by the main character played by actor George Scott. You just cannot con someone who DOES NOT want something for nothing.
Are all Alien ET entities operating in an evil capacity? The answer is no. Some are programmed to be humanistic and to play a beneficial role in order to keep humans in high positions of power from understanding what is behind them and that they are created by the Third Force as his own synthetic race. Do they have eternal souls as humans are designed to have? The answer is probably not. Only God Almighty has the power to create such.
The bottom line is this, the Third Force, Lucifer hates the Creator (the Fourth Force, the Supreme Ruler of the Universe) and wants to destroy all His creation and substitute his own creations including his own synthetic race of human like creatures.
Part of Lucifer’s plan is to systematically destroy all humans and all God’s creatures and substitute his own who will serve and worship him and his system of predatory evil.
One of my deeply embedded, incredibly well-connected sources (not associated with VT in any way) who just happens to be a devout Christian believer assures me that Jesus is the personification of the Fourth Force and voluntarily suffered and died for our evil and sins.
After three days He rose up from death back to sit at the right-hand of God Almighty, thus giving up his Earthly human life as God-man to provide those of us who believe in Him with eternal life with Him and others who are under his forgiveness, grace and protection.
This same source has argued convincingly that the EH and their God Lucifer (aka the Third Force) are always two-faced liars and deceivers, always committed to opposites of what normal moral people want, and continually need to pedophile children, murder, torture, ritual sacrifice and mass-murder others, thus seizing other’s life force in order to assure their continued survival and empowerment. Yes, judgment is now on its way for the KM and its EH.
It is important to realize that many who have been wrongly attacked, tortured, murdered and oppressed by he KM and its EH will be made whole by a loving God Almighty, who will restore their lives in a new, eternal and healthy form.
Because Lucifer is cut off from God Almighty (aka the Fourth Force, the source of all truth and life), Lucifer (Satan) is thus disconnected from eternal truth and mistakenly believes he can win this war between good and evil now being fought. Lucifer’s end is going to eventually be the same as the Khazarian Mafia and its EH which is now rapidly headed for complete exposure via the Intern and word of mouth, complete dis-empowerment, destruction and worldwide eradication.
Lucifer’s last greatest deception is the Alien ET card which he will use to convince the masses that humans were created by ancient aliens or just by naturally occurring evolution and that there is no Eternal Creator (aka God Almighty).
He plans to raise up a man who will appear so good and powerful and will temporarily solve the worldwide economic/monetary problems with very crafty international/global statesmanship. A majority will believe his claims that he is the Messiah that has come to earth to save the human race from impending ruin and destruction. He will call himself the Christ and will fool many who will worship him as God Almighty (the Fourth Force). In order to attain this acceptance, he will destroy the Khazarian Mafia (KM), eliminate the Select few with no mercy and will fix things for a while. But soon he will begin to sacrifice children in his new temple and will become an insidious tyrant.
Actually be the real and final anti-Christ, the best impersonator of Jesus Christ ever and the Third Force’s imitator Messiah designed to lead many astray will appear to solve all the world’s problems and will succeed for a short time. Soon after, likely within five months, judgment of the Fourth Force (Almighty God, our Creator) will fall on Planet Earth and God Almighty will wage a short hard war against the Lucifer (Satan) and his Fallen Ones. The anti-Christ will deploy all the armies and advanced back-engineered Alien ET technologies he has been given control of and will throw everything against God’s invading armies in a massive attempt to defeat God Almighty. But all this will be to no avail because the Third Force and all his believers will be annihilated.
Stay tuned because thanks to the worldwide Internet, the New Gutenberg Press which communicates vast history and contemporary facts and information at the sped of light instead of the speed of paper and ink, the EH and the KM days are now seriously limited. Why is this so? Because they cannot exist and even survive with such massive exposure as is already occurring.
And as insiders have reported Putin and the Russian Federation still have deeply embedded agents who have completely penetrated all Israeli and American Intel and have had complete access to all NSA downloads to Tel Aviv under the Six Eyes Treaty System from the start. It is now convincingly clear that Putin and the Russian Federation, the World’s new real good-guys, have all the NSA downloads of how the EH and the KM attacked America on 9-11-01 and many other US state crimes of the KM and its EH, and is likely planning to release them on the Internet all over the world at strategically planned times, where they will have the most geopolitical impact.
This alone will fully expose the EH and the KM to be parts of the same Satanic Globalist NWO organization as Putin has already publicly claimed.
He or she who has ears, let them hear; he or she who has eyes, let them see; and he or she who still has a heart, character, and basic morality, and working intuition able to judge the difference between good and evil, let them be aware of the KM and its EH and help expose them to all your family and friends who will listen.
Our system of modern capitalism is just one story; it is not the only one there is. It’s not inherent within us. It isn’t some inevitable expression of predefined Human Nature. It was invented by human beings and so human beings can change it. But in order to get there, we first have to engage in some ‘dangerous thinking’.
That is, there are no dangerous thoughts for the simple reason that thinking itself is such a dangerous enterprise. . . . nonthinking is even more dangerous. – Hannah Arendt
Wherever we turn, it seems that there is a great narrowing. Ideas that have engaged great leaders, philosophers, poets and visionaries through the ages are being boxed away as if they are obvious, and settled. What is human progress? What do we mean by ‘growth’? What is freedom? How do we balance our wants and needs against those of future generations? These are the foundations of human life and society and yet there is ever-less interest in them in the corridors of global power.
The front edge of this wave is that mesh of political and corporate actors who wield material global power; this includes the leaders of G20 nations and Fortune 500 companies and the vast majority of parliamentarians and executives that surround them. Each of them will give you the same basic answers. They will say that progress is, first and foremost, economic growth. Everything – by which they mean everything – else is secondary because it’s necessarily an offshoot of that growth; it’s the economy, stupid! Growth, in turn, is the increase of profit or the national equivalent, Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Ergo, GDP is progress. Freedom is the capacity of me and mine to have and to own, to progress and to grow according to the above. Our wants and needs are paramount; sacrificing an inch of that freedom is unconscionable.
The answer to which should be, how long have you got?
This narrowing is happening at a time when what is required is a great expansion. Is this truly the best/worst system human beings can create? Does economic growth really capture who we are? Does vast inequality represent the best humanity can do? Is destruction of our planetary habitat inevitable? To answer these sorts of questions we need more options, not more uniformity; more deep thinking, not more rote acceptance; more opposition, not more repetition of the cold, dry lie that there is no alternative.
We would like to suggest that our only absolute limitation is our collective imagination, expressed through our will to change the mythologies that hold this house of cards together. We believe there is an emergent consciousness, stretching out against this narrowing, gradually becoming aware of itself and its awesome power.
We can hear its insurgent voice in social movements as diverse as the Arab Spring, the Chilean Winter, the Idle No More Indigenous movement, the anti-corruption movements in Brazil and India, the gentle but insistent dissent of Occupy Central in Hong Kong, the furious disbelief of protestors in Ferguson and New York City, and the dozens of African Awakenings happening across the Continent. They are each different and specific, but at the heart of all of them is a voice saying that we have a system that is failing 99% of us. As whole populations are learning to communicate and think together in order to cope with whole-world problems, it says, we can do much, much better.
Our system of modern capitalism is just one story; it is not the only one there is. It’s not inherent within us. It isn’t some inevitable expression of predefined Human Nature. It was invented by human beings and so human beings can change it. But in order to get there, we first have to engage in some ‘dangerous thinking’.
Dangerous Thought One: Ideology Rules
Those in power have always told us to beware of ideology. There is a strong inference that it represents a warping of our pragmatic ability to get things done by whatever means necessary. But that’s just plain wrong. And a necessary distraction, of course. Ideology is the set of ideas and ideals we all must hold to operate in the world. It is not a weakness of those who don’t agree with us.
The deep irony is that by demonising ideology they are clearing space for their ideology in particular. If only bad or stupid people are ideological, the logic goes, those we vote for and buy from, who fill our TV screens and make our laptops, somehow can’t be ideologues themselves. The ideas that bind them must be above ideology. That is their story.
But is there any way in which the US spending of $400 billion annually on the military is not a statement of ideology? Or the subsidization of very large, very rich corporations like Exxon Mobil or GE with taxpayer’s money? Or the failure to regulate the casino banks of Wall Street? These are all active strategies for success by some measure, grounded in ideas and ideals, and so are, by definition, deeply ideological. Simply saying your ideals float above ideology doesn’t make it so. It simply turns our fear of ‘being ideological’ into a means of reinforcing the potency of the status quo. As the philosopher Slavoj Zizek says, “ideology is always a background condition”.The dominant ideology in the world today is called neoliberal capitalism. Some call it the Washington Consensus or Market Fundamentalism, but for the sake of this conversation, we’ll call it Neoliberalism.
Quite simply, it is a practical expression of three philosophical premises. First, that our relationship to others is best filtered through a competitive lens (am I better, richer, etc.), which inevitably leads to rigid hierarchies, zero-sum logic and a lot of unthinking dogma.
Second, it equates wealth with life success, which is then equated to virtue (e.g. rich people are good, poor people are bad, therefore poverty is a moral failing). Finally, the individual is the primary unit of power (e.g. Thatcher’s famous line “There is no such thing as society, just individuals and families”). People are responsible to themselves first, peers second, and possibly their God, in that order. Classic Ayn Rand.
The implications for this ‘moral philosophy’ are diabolical. It leads directly to the economics of the self-obsessed individual, which leads to the atomization of our society and the focus on personal consumption as salvation. It justifies the bankrupt notion of trickle down economics, smuggling in notions such as: ‘self-interest benefits everyone’, ‘there’s an all-knowing invisible hand’, ‘there is supreme efficiency in the market’, ‘the more rich people the better’, etc. And it prioritizes private property rather than the collective ownership, which in turn leads to what the late Harvard economist J.K. Galbraith called “private affluence and public squalor”.
Neoliberalism can be summarized by this equation: selfishness is rational and rationality is everything; therefore selfishness is everything.
Dangerous Thought Two: Climate change and inequality are created by our current economic system.
How many of us truly believe the old economist’s trope that the world’s major issues such as climate change and inequality are ‘externalities’ of our current system; things that have come to be entirely alongside or even in spite of what humans have been doing? It is self-evident that they are the logical outcome of a system that requires ever more consumption to drive perpetual material growth, and that is fueled by the extraction of a finite supply of natural resources.
Bloomberg recently reported that for every dollar of income created in the US since 2008, 93 cents of the income growth has gone to top 1%. So it doesn’t matter where that money is made, 93 cents is going to the top 1%. Therefore, every dollar of wealth created by definition creates more inequality. As coders would say, this is not a bug in the system, but a feature of the system.
Relatedly, the activist and scholar Firoze Manji has suggested that climate change is not man made, but capital made. Every dollar of wealth created in the world heats up our planet because we have an extractives and fossil fuel based economy.
Capitalism turns natural resources into commodities in order to attract more capital. That’s its sole purpose. As the recent International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report has shown, we are now on course for a 3-4 degree rise in temperature by 2050, which is correlated to a 40% – 50% loss of biodiversity. In other words, half of all plant and animal life on this planet will no longer be with us in under 40 years because of the voracious human appetite for more growth. Scientists tell us that we are already in 6th great planetary extinction with 150 – 200 species dying every day. This is 1000 times the baseline rate of extinction.
The logic of neoliberalism and our current economic system locks us into this path dependency, so it feels like we can never risk slowing growth. We even subsidize our own destruction by giving more money to fossil fuel companies and expanding their ability to destroy the planet through additional infrastructure like new pipelines and oil exploration projects. Exxon made over $40 billion in profit last year, the highest profit in the history of money, while the US government gave them over $1 billion of tax payer money in subsidies in the same year. And they are paying less than 15% in tax, and paying zero federal tax.
Most of us understand these links and the logic, but with the great narrowing in the corridors of power there is seemingly no way to turn that knowledge into concerted action. At least, that is what the power elites would like us to believe.
Dangerous Thought Three: We all live in the Matrix
There are some of us who believe that we are exempt from the neoliberal operating system. That this is an American or British, or even now, a Chinese phenomenon. But we would argue that through globalization and the global rule of corporations, we have now entered a late stage of capitalism in which we effectively all live in a One Party Planet – the Neoliberal Party.
Under this party, we are connected into a virtual Matrix by a web of beliefs, laws and structures.
We are programmed from birth to believe in the moral philosophy of competition, individualism, the virtue of material consumption, and social status determined by the wealth hierarchy.
We are told that wealth is a sign of virtue. And it’s a short step from there to believing that those with the most money are the most virtuous, that they deserve to have power over the rest of us.
We are convinced that paying off every debt to rich corporations and people is a moral obligation – that if we can’t, there is something wrong with us and we deserve to be punished.
In reality, we all know instinctively that we are defined by our connections to each other. Our individuality is a truth within the intricate web of society. Our individuation may help us operate in the world and navigate relationships, but it is not an impermeable barrier that we should celebrate as the be all and end all of life.
It is self-evident that the richest are no less connected than anyone else, which means that they, like everyone else, rely on the society of humans around them for their wealth – on government subsidies and services, on public education and tax-funded research, and on the hard labour of people poorer than themselves.
Virtue is not the preserve of those who have hoarded the most money. If anything, the reverse is true. There is mounting scientific evidence to suggest that being so addicted to material wealth that you acquire it in the millions or billions is an unhealthy addiction that stunts moral, emotional and spiritual growth, and it can lead to highly sociopathic behaviour.
The line between sociopathic behaviour and a psychopathy is blurry at best. Just look at how large corporations, very often supported by governments, are forever coming up with even more ingenious ways to create debt, and aggressively promote ways of life and moral codes that require it so they can be confident that we will keep funneling money in their direction in the form of interest. This is a means of ensuring we remain submissive and docile as we focus all of our energy struggling to meet the obligations they have defined.
When there is potential to overturn the operating system – for example, the 2008 financial crisis – it in fact punishes the poor first and hardest as we are enmeshed in the global capital infrastructure from the food we buy to where our pensions are invested. The old trope holds true that the rich become even richer because power begets power, and money begets money – and the two are interchangeable. And this is what is most valued by the machine.
The Matrix is so powerful and adaptable that even when we do dissent, it often gets commodified and sold back to us. There were Occupy Wall Street posters being sold at Wal Mart last Christmas for over $40 USD a pop. Even techniques for spirituality are co-opted to make us better capitalists. There has been an exponential rise of Buddhism, yoga, meditation, Ayurvedic and other Eastern practices as crutches for mental burnout and spiritual ennui in capitalist countries.
The dark spider web of neoliberal belief is so powerful because it binds economic logic to a moral logic, so to question the economic logic (e.g. growth) is to question the morality of how we live and our very personhood. Since our jobs and our identities are all intertwined with that of the system, we are incapable of breaking free of the logic.
As the philosopher John Ralston Saul has said: “we assume that people of merit rise to the top of the system. But in fact, the system finds the people that are best constructed to further its own existence, and draws them to the top.” In other words, if the system values selfishness above all else, selfish people above all others will be rewarded with what the system has to offer.
We have all created our own stories in order to feel as comfortable as we can in the Matrix. People at the World Bank or the Gates Foundation believe they’re helping the poor, and in limited ways many of them are. People in advertising agencies think they’re contributing by being creative and increasing consumer choice, and at a micro-level this may be true. But by accepting and then validating the logic at the heart of the system they are in fact ensuring the murky waters of the status quo stay toxic. If we attempt to prune a tree in a rotten orchard, are we really having any impact on the health of the orchard?
Dangerous Thought Four: We live in false economy
So what is the root driver of all this madness? How deep do we have to dig?
The answer to that is, until we find what binds all the destructive forces. And within the current Matrix that we are all unmeshed, the root of growth is debt.
In a debt-based monetary system, the very creation of money creates debt. Therefore, growth has to exceed interest (which is the payback of debt) in order for capital to increase.
We thus get locked into perpetual debt-based growth, which creates inequality and destroys our planet. As David Attenborough has said, “If you believe in infinite growth on a finite planet, you are either a madman or an economist.”
We value the wrong thing – i.e. financial wealth – so we in turn measure the wrong thing – i.e. growth. We therefore live in a false economy.
Let’s give a concrete example. The global economy roughly grew at 3% last year (2014), which generated an additional $2.2 trillion in ‘new’ products and services. In other words, commodified natural resources and human labour to the tune of $2.2 trillion. This is equivalent of global GDP in 1970. It took us from the dawn of humanity to 1970 to achieve an annual GDP of $2.2 trillion dollars – we now require that amount just in the delta of a single year. Next year we may need 1974’s GDP, then 1990’s, etc. Soon we’ll need to 2015’s GDP in order for the global Ponzi scheme not to implode.
The mathematical way to describe this is that we are now in a period of exponential growth. When this happens in an organism we call it cancer: uncontrollable growth of cells to the point of self-annihilation. And because we are all locked into a Matrix that serves the neoliberal ideology, we are made complicit in our own self-annihilation. Growth is couched in jobs and securing investments, and indeed that’s true, so it becomes all of our business to create further growth.
This is not a dark room conspiracy – from the survival of the most basic cell all the way up to the infinite complexity of the Internet, this is how complex adaptive systems behave. They create and emerge from matrices of energy and matter that support their existence. The logic of capital is merely the logic of a particular complex, adaptive system. As Thomas Picketty recently has proven in such detail, left to its own devices, the system will always reward capital with more capital, pulled from the sources of production it has.
And while the destruction amasses, we are sold a false idea of the economy as a necessary savior to keep us complicit.
In 2011, 110 of the 175 largest global economic entities on earth were corporations, with the corporate sector representing a clear majority (over 60 percent) over countries. The revenues of Royal Dutch Shell, for instance, were on par with the GDP of Norway and dwarfed the GDP of Thailand, Denmark or Venezuela.
In other words, more economic power is in private hands than public. Most corporations started the globalization process by exploiting human labor where it was cheapest and the rules were the most slack. They then capitalized on the lack of global governance around tax and essentially opted out of the social contract with humanity – there’s now $32 trillion sitting in tax havens and 60% of world trade happens between MNCs own subsidiaries, largely through what’s known as transfer mis-pricing. And then the kicker, they subverted our democracy. Research from Harvard’s Saffra Center for Ethics shows that corporations achieve up to a $220 ROI for lobbying Congress. Why would you ‘invest’ your money in anything else.
We are told that as the rich get richer the rest of us will get richer too. But we know now that this is a lie. Average wages are lower today than they were in the 1960s, and household incomes are stagnating while the 1% are growing richer than ever before. Today, the richest 85 people in the world have more wealth than the poorest 3.5 billion.
We are told that we can solve global poverty if rich countries give more aid to poor countries. But see beyond the rhetoric and it’s horribly obvious that aid is flowing in the other direction. Rich countries are rich because they grab land and natural resources, and exploit the human labor of poor countries. We will only be able to eliminate poverty once we stop this plunder.
We believe that governments run the world, and that those governments are democratic. But the most powerful entities on earth are corporations, not governments, run for private profit not public good. And these corporations exercise undue influence over government policies. In a system where money buys votes, democracy is nothing but an illusion, and the hopes and desires of the majority are rarely considered.
We believe that our media is free and impartial. But in reality 90% of the media is controlled by only six corporations, which silence all criticism of their interests. And our Internet – which we rely on to communicate and share ideas – is poisoned by a global network of state surveillance.
We are told to that our current way of living provides some kind of ‘order’ forgetting that the entire system has been built upon the history of colonialism, imperialism and genocide. Not to mention the constant state of war, and plunder from poorer nations, that is required to prop up the Western way of life.
The only way to change things is to change what the system itself values, and to change the very rules that articulate and maintain those values.
Dangerous Thought Five: Another story is possible
These myths are falling apart around us, and the story that they uphold is beginning to collapse. The system is constructed by a set of laws and rules and beliefs constructed by human beings. As the comedian Russell Brand says, “Capitalism is not real; it is an idea. America is not real; it is an idea that someone had ages ago. Britain, Christianity, Islam, karate, Wednesdays are all just ideas that we choose to believe in and very nice ideas they are, too, when they serve a purpose. These concepts, though, cannot be served to the detriment of actual reality.”
We yearn for a different story, a better story, a story that is truer to the values we know are right – a story that celebrates our connections to others and to our broader world. We are eager to cast off debts, to stop being complicit in the exploitation of our brothers and sisters around the world, to cease the destructive pillage, to abandon the competition that turns friend into foe, and to recover our relationships. We are ready for healing.
We know that there are other stories out there.
Anthropologists tell us that for most of human history we lived in small egalitarian societies that rewarded co-operation and sharing and punished selfishness and accumulation. No one is saying we can go back to a hunter-gatherer lifestyle, but it’s an indicator of what’s possible for human nature – in fact, we have over 90,000 years of inspiration of what is possible.
Just ten years ago scientists discovered what they call mirror neurons, proving that we are hard-wired for empathy. And behavioral economists have shown that, when left to our own devices, tend to default to values of fairness and justice. These are the better, truer angels of our nature.
All we lack is the confidence to see beyond the constraints of the present story. And we start by asking the hard questions we have been told not to ask. People around the world are beginning to do just this. They are rising up in response to our civilization’s crisis – from Occupy Wall Street to the Arab Spring, from protests in Brazil to the Chilean Winter, from the Zapatistas in Mexico to the student uprising in Quebec, from the Idle No More Indigenous People’s movement to Transition Towns around the world – these are all expressions of a new world that is possible. They are sites of great hope for us all. The world is beginning to heal—and we can take it farther, faster.
There are new ideas bubbling up all around the world that point to a better way. Some of these solutions are not difficult, like moving away from GDP as a measure of progress, taxing carbon at its source, creating a global wealth tax, banning certain types of advertising, putting a moratorium on rigged trade rules (like the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership), and even putting limits on how powerful corporations can become (e.g. the anti-trust laws that used to exist around the world, most notably in the United States up to the 1970s). Others are more radical, like removing corporate money from politics, abolishing military spending, revoking corporations’ right to do business if they don’t serve our collective interest, moving to a four hour work day, providing a basic citizen’s income to every human being, devolving power to local communities governed by direct democracy, an even getting rid of our debt-based currency system altogether.
Ideas abound. The decision is ours to reclaim our past and our future. Will we continue as soldiers of the status quo, regardless of destruction it will guarantee? Or will we stand with the world’s majority to create the better world we know is possible?
Alnoor Ladha and Martin Kirk are founding members of /The Rules, a global network of activists, organizers, designers, coders, researchers and writers dedicated to changing the rules that create inequality and poverty around the world.
[Who issued the checks? Has the United Nations moved against the banks handling Taliban finances yet?]
The Afghan National Police (ANP) forces have arrested a finance official of the Taliban militants group during an operation in eastern Nangarhar province of Afghanistan.
The Ministry of Interior (MoI) said Mir Azam was arrested during an operation in Pichegeram district of Nangarhar.
A statement by MoI said Mir Azam is originally a resident of eastern Kunar province of Afghanistan and was arrested as he was apparently arranging funds for the group by carrying two cheques of 10 million and 30 million Pakistani rupees.
The statement further added that the ANP forces have also confiscated a Pakistani ID card, some propaganda material, 2 Pakistani sim cards, and a Islamic Emirate ID.
The Taliban militants group has not commented regarding the report so far which comes as the group is busy in attempting to coordinate its spring offensive.
However, the Afghan officials have said the group’s spring offensive launched under the name of Omari Operations last month has been successfully repulsed as the militants of the group have suffered heavy casualties in the battle ground.
The group announced its spring offensive despite efforts by the Afghan government to end the violence in the country through reconciliation efforts.
Friday 17 July 2015 11.00 BST
The red flags and marching songs of Syriza during the Greek crisis, plus the expectation that the banks would be nationalized, revived briefly a 20th-century dream: the forced destruction of the market from above. For much of the 20th century this was how the left conceived the first stage of an economy beyond capitalism. The force would be applied by the working class, either at the ballot box or on the barricades. The lever would be the state. The opportunity would come through frequent episodes of economic collapse.
Instead over the past 25 years it has been the left’s project that has collapsed. The market destroyed the plan; individualism replaced collectivism and solidarity; the hugely expanded workforce of the world looks like a “proletariat”, but no longer thinks or behaves as it once did.
If you lived through all this, and disliked capitalism, it was traumatic. But in the process technology has created a new route out, which the remnants of the old left – and all other forces influenced by it – have either to embrace or die. Capitalism, it turns out, will not be abolished by forced-march techniques. It will be abolished by creating something more dynamic that exists, at first, almost unseen within the old system, but which will break through, reshaping the economy around new values and behaviors. I call this post capitalism.
As with the end of feudalism 500 years ago, capitalism’s replacement by post-capitalism will be accelerated by external shocks and shaped by the emergence of a new kind of human being. And it has started.
Post capitalism is possible because of three major changes information technology has brought about in the past 25 years. First, it has reduced the need for work, blurred the edges between work and free time and loosened the relationship between work and wages. The coming wave of automation, currently stalled because our social infrastructure cannot bear the consequences, will hugely diminish the amount of work needed – not just to subsist but to provide a decent life for all.
Second, information is corroding the market’s ability to form prices correctly. That is because markets are based on scarcity while information is abundant. The system’s defense mechanism is to form monopolies – the giant tech companies – on a scale not seen in the past 200 years, yet they cannot last. By building business models and share valuations based on the capture and privatization of all socially produced information, such firms are constructing a fragile corporate edifice at odds with the most basic need of humanity, which is to use ideas freely.
Third, we’re seeing the spontaneous rise of collaborative production: goods, services and organizations are appearing that no longer respond to the dictates of the market and the managerial hierarchy. The biggest information product in the world – Wikipedia – is made by volunteers for free, abolishing the encyclopedia business and depriving the advertising industry of an estimated $3bn a year in revenue.
Almost unnoticed, in the niches and hollows of the market system, whole swaths of economic life are beginning to move to a different rhythm. Parallel currencies, time banks, cooperatives and self-managed spaces have proliferated, barely noticed by the economics profession, and often as a direct result of the shattering of the old structures in the post-2008 crisis.
You only find this new economy if you look hard for it. In Greece, when a grassroots NGO mapped the country’s food co-ops, alternative producers, parallel currencies and local exchange systems they found more than 70 substantive projects and hundreds of smaller initiatives ranging from squats to carpools to free kindergartens. To mainstream economics such things seem barely to qualify as economic activity – but that’s the point. They exist because they trade, however haltingly and inefficiently, in the currency of post-capitalism: free time, networked activity and free stuff. It seems a meager and unofficial and even dangerous thing from which to craft an entire alternative to a global system, but so did money and credit in the age of Edward III.
New forms of ownership, new forms of lending, new legal contracts: a whole business subculture has emerged over the past 10 years, which the media has dubbed the “sharing economy”. Buzzwords such as the “commons” and “peer-production” are thrown around, but few have bothered to ask what this development means for capitalism itself.
I believe it offers an escape route – but only if these micro-level projects are nurtured, promoted and protected by a fundamental change in what governments do. And this must be driven by a change in our thinking – about technology, ownership and work. So that, when we create the elements of the new system, we can say to ourselves, and to others: “This is no longer simply my survival mechanism, my bolt hole from the neoliberal world; this is a new way of living in the process of formation.”
The 2008 crash wiped 13% off global production and 20% off global trade. Global growth became negative – on a scale where anything below +3% is counted as a recession. It produced, in the west, a depression phase longer than in 1929-33, and even now, amid a pallid recovery, has left mainstream economists terrified about the prospect of long-term stagnation. The aftershocks in Europe are tearing the continent apart.
The solutions have been austerity plus monetary excess. But they are not working. In the worst-hit countries, the pension system has been destroyed, the retirement age is being hiked to 70, and education is being privatized so that graduates now face a lifetime of high debt. Services are being dismantled and infrastructure projects put on hold.
Even now many people fail to grasp the true meaning of the word “austerity”. Austerity is not eight years of spending cuts, as in the UK, or even the social catastrophe inflicted on Greece. It means driving the wages, social wages and living standards in the west down for decades until they meet those of the middle class in China and India on the way up.
Meanwhile in the absence of any alternative model, the conditions for another crisis are being assembled. Real wages have fallen or remained stagnant in Japan, the southern Eurozone, the US and UK. The shadow banking system has been reassembled, and is now bigger than it was in 2008. New rules demanding banks hold more reserves have been watered down or delayed. Meanwhile, flushed with free money, the 1% has got richer.
Neoliberalism, then, has morphed into a system programmed to inflict recurrent catastrophic failures. Worse than that, it has broken the 200-year pattern of industrial capitalism wherein an economic crisis spurs new forms of technological innovation that benefit everybody.
That is because neoliberalism was the first economic model in 200 years the upswing of which was premised on the suppression of wages and smashing the social power and resilience of the working class. If we review the take-off periods studied by long-cycle theorists – the 1850s in Europe, the 1900s and 1950s across the globe – it was the strength of organized labour that forced entrepreneurs and corporations to stop trying to revive outdated business models through wage cuts, and to innovate their way to a new form of capitalism.
The result is that, in each upswing, we find a synthesis of automation, higher wages and higher-value consumption. Today there is no pressure from the workforce, and the technology at the center of this innovation wave does not demand the creation of higher-consumer spending, or the re‑employment of the old workforce in new jobs. Information is a machine for grinding the price of things lower and slashing the work time needed to support life on the planet.
As a result, large parts of the business class have become neo-luddites. Faced with the possibility of creating gene-sequencing labs, they instead start coffee shops, nail bars and contract cleaning firms: the banking system, the planning system and late neoliberal culture reward above all the creator of low-value, long-hours jobs.
Innovation is happening but it has not, so far, triggered the fifth long upswing for capitalism that long-cycle theory would expect. The reasons lie in the specific nature of information technology.
We’re surrounded not just by intelligent machines but by a new layer of reality centred on information. Consider an airliner: a computer flies it; it has been designed, stress-tested and “virtually manufactured” millions of times; it is firing back real-time information to its manufacturers. On board are people squinting at screens connected, in some lucky countries, to the internet.
Seen from the ground it is the same white metal bird as in the James Bond era. But it is now both an intelligent machine and a node on a network. It has an information content and is adding “information value” as well as physical value to the world. On a packed business flight, when everyone’s peering at Excel or Powerpoint, the passenger cabin is best understood as an information factory.
But what is all this information worth? You won’t find an answer in the accounts: intellectual property is valued in modern accounting standards by guesswork. A study for the SAS Institute in 2013 found that, in order to put a value on data, neither the cost of gathering it, nor the market value or the future income from it could be adequately calculated. Only through a form of accounting that included non-economic benefits, and risks, could companies actually explain to their shareholders what their data was really worth. Something is broken in the logic we use to value the most important thing in the modern world.
The great technological advance of the early 21st century consists not only of new objects and processes, but of old ones made intelligent. The knowledge content of products is becoming more valuable than the physical things that are used to produce them. But it is a value measured as usefulness, not exchange or asset value. In the 1990s economists and technologists began to have the same thought at once: that this new role for information was creating a new, “third” kind of capitalism – as different from industrial capitalism as industrial capitalism was to the merchant and slave capitalism of the 17th and 18th centuries. But they have struggled to describe the dynamics of the new “cognitive” capitalism. And for a reason. Its dynamics are profoundly non-capitalist.
During and right after the second world war, economists viewed information simply as a “public good”. The US government even decreed that no profit should be made out of patents, only from the production process itself. Then we began to understand intellectual property. In 1962, Kenneth Arrow, the guru of mainstream economics, said that in a free market economy the purpose of inventing things is to create intellectual property rights. He noted: “precisely to the extent that it is successful there is an under utilization of information.”
You can observe the truth of this in every e-business model ever constructed: monopolize and protect data, capture the free social data generated by user interaction, push commercial forces into areas of data production that were non-commercial before, mine the existing data for predictive value – always and everywhere ensuring nobody but the corporation can utilize the results.
If we restate Arrow’s principle in reverse, its revolutionary implications are obvious: if a free market economy plus intellectual property leads to the “under utilization of information”, then an economy based on the full utilization of information cannot tolerate the free market or absolute intellectual property rights. The business models of all our modern digital giants are designed to prevent the abundance of information.
Yet information is abundant. Information goods are freely replicable. Once a thing is made, it can be copied/pasted infinitely. A music track or the giant database you use to build an airliner has a production cost; but its cost of reproduction falls towards zero. Therefore, if the normal price mechanism of capitalism prevails over time, its price will fall towards zero, too.
For the past 25 years economics has been wrestling with this problem: all mainstream economics proceeds from a condition of scarcity, yet the most dynamic force in our modern world is abundant and, as hippy genius Stewart Brand once put it, “wants to be free”.
There is, alongside the world of monopolized information and surveillance created by corporations and governments, a different dynamic growing up around information: information as a social good, free at the point of use, incapable of being owned or exploited or priced. I’ve surveyed the attempts by economists and business gurus to build a framework to understand the dynamics of an economy based on abundant, socially-held information. But it was actually imagined by one 19th-century economist in the era of the telegraph and the steam engine. His name? Karl Marx.
The scene is Kentish Town, London, February 1858, sometime around 4am. Marx is a wanted man in Germany and is hard at work scribbling thought-experiments and notes-to-self. When they finally get to see what Marx is writing on this night, the left intellectuals of the 1960s will admit that it “challenges every serious interpretation of Marx yet conceived”. It is called “The Fragment on Machines”.
In the “Fragment” Marx imagines an economy in which the main role of machines is to produce, and the main role of people is to supervise them. He was clear that, in such an economy, the main productive force would be information. The productive power of such machines as the automated cotton-spinning machine, the telegraph and the steam locomotive did not depend on the amount of labor it took to produce them but on the state of social knowledge. Organization and knowledge, in other words, made a bigger contribution to productive power than the work of making and running the machines.
Given what Marxism was to become – a theory of exploitation based on the theft of labor time – this is a revolutionary statement. It suggests that, once knowledge becomes a productive force in its own right, outweighing the actual labor spent creating a machine, the big question becomes not one of “wages versus profits” but who controls what Marx called the “power of knowledge”.
In an economy where machines do most of the work, the nature of the knowledge locked inside the machines must, he writes, be “social”. In a final late-night thought experiment Marx imagined the end point of this trajectory: the creation of an “ideal machine”, which lasts forever and costs nothing. A machine that could be built for nothing would, he said, add no value at all to the production process and rapidly, over several accounting periods, reduce the price, profit and labor costs of everything else it touched.
Once you understand that information is physical, and that software is a machine, and that storage, bandwidth and processing power are collapsing in price at exponential rates, the value of Marx’s thinking becomes clear. We are surrounded by machines that cost nothing and could, if we wanted them to, last forever.
In these musings, not published until the mid-20th century, Marx imagined information coming to be stored and shared in something called a “general intellect” – which was the mind of everybody on Earth connected by social knowledge, in which every upgrade benefits everybody. In short, he had imagined something close to the information economy in which we live. And, he wrote, its existence would “blow capitalism sky high”.
…With the terrain changed, the old path beyond capitalism imagined by the left of the 20th century is lost.
But a different path has opened up. Collaborative production, using network technology to produce goods and services that only work when they are free, or shared, defines the route beyond the market system. It will need the state to create the framework – just as it created the framework for factory labor, sound currencies and free trade in the early 19th century. The post-capitalist sector is likely to coexist with the market sector for decades, but major change is happening.
Networks restore “granularity” to the post-capitalist project. That is, they can be the basis of a non-market system that replicates itself, which does not need to be created afresh every morning on the computer screen of a commissar.
The transition will involve the state, the market and collaborative production beyond the market. But to make it happen, the entire project of the left, from protest groups to the mainstream social democratic and liberal parties, will have to be reconfigured. In fact, once people understand the logic of the post-capitalist transition, such ideas will no longer be the property of the left – but of a much wider movement, for which we will need new labels.
Who can make this happen? In the old left project it was the industrial working class. More than 200 years ago, the radical journalist John Thelwall warned the men who built the English factories that they had created a new and dangerous form of democracy: “Every large workshop and manufactory is a sort of political society, which no act of parliament can silence, and no magistrate disperse.”
Today the whole of society is a factory. We all participate in the creation and recreation of the brands, norms and institutions that surround us. At the same time the communication grids vital for everyday work and profit are buzzing with shared knowledge and discontent. Today it is the network – like the workshop 200 years ago – that they “cannot silence or disperse”.
True, states can shut down Facebook, Twitter, even the entire internet and mobile network in times of crisis, paralyzing the economy in the process. And they can store and monitor every kilobyte of information we produce. But they cannot reimpose the hierarchical, propaganda-driven and ignorant society of 50 years ago, except – as in China, North Korea or Iran – by opting out of key parts of modern life. It would be, as sociologist Manuel Castells put it, like trying to de-electrify a country.
By creating millions of networked people, financially exploited but with the whole of human intelligence one thumb-swipe away, info-capitalism has created a new agent of change in history: the educated and connected human being.
This will be more than just an economic transition. There are, of course, the parallel and urgent tasks of decarbonizing the world and dealing with demographic and fiscal time bombs. But I’m concentrating on the economic transition triggered by information because, up to now, it has been sidelined. Peer-to-peer has become pigeonholed as a niche obsession for visionaries, while the “big boys” of leftwing economics get on with critiquing austerity.
In fact, on the ground in places such as Greece, resistance to austerity and the creation of “networks you can’t default on” – as one activist put it to me – go hand in hand. Above all, post-capitalism as a concept is about new forms of human behavior that conventional economics would hardly recognize as relevant.
So how do we visualize the transition ahead? The only coherent parallel we have is the replacement of feudalism by capitalism – and thanks to the work of epidemiologists, geneticists and data analysts, we know a lot more about that transition than we did 50 years ago when it was “owned” by social science. The first thing we have to recognize is: different modes of production are structured around different things. Feudalism was an economic system structured by customs and laws about “obligation”. Capitalism was structured by something purely economic: the market. We can predict, from this, that post-capitalism – whose precondition is abundance – will not simply be a modified form of a complex market society. But we can only begin to grasp at a positive vision of what it will be like.
I don’t mean this as a way to avoid the question: the general economic parameters of a post-capitalist society by, for example, the year 2075, can be outlined. But if such a society is structured around human liberation, not economics, unpredictable things will begin to shape it.
For example, the most obvious thing to Shakespeare, writing in 1600, was that the market had called forth new kinds of behavior and morality. By analogy, the most obvious “economic” thing to the Shakespeare of 2075 will be the total upheaval in gender relationships, or sexuality, or health. Perhaps there will not even be any playwrights: perhaps the very nature of the media we use to tell stories will change – just as it changed in Elizabethan London when the first public theaters were built.
Think of the difference between, say, Horatio in Hamlet and a character such as Daniel Doyce in Dickens’s Little Dorrit. Both carry around with them a characteristic obsession of their age – Horatio is obsessed with humanist philosophy; Doyce is obsessed with patenting his invention. There can be no character like Doyce in Shakespeare; he would, at best, get a bit part as a working-class comic figure. Yet, by the time Dickens described Doyce, most of his readers knew somebody like him. Just as Shakespeare could not have imagined Doyce, so we too cannot imagine the kind of human beings society will produce once economics is no longer central to life. But we can see their prefigurative forms in the lives of young people all over the world breaking down 20th-century barriers around sexuality, work, creativity and the self.
The feudal model of agriculture collided, first, with environmental limits and then with a massive external shock – the Black Death. After that, there was a demographic shock: too few workers for the land, which raised their wages and made the old feudal obligation system impossible to enforce. The labor shortage also forced technological innovation. The new technologies that underpinned the rise of merchant capitalism were the ones that stimulated commerce (printing and accountancy), the creation of tradeable wealth (mining, the compass and fast ships) and productivity (mathematics and the scientific method).
Present throughout the whole process was something that looks incidental to the old system – money and credit – but which was actually destined to become the basis of the new system. In feudalism, many laws and customs were actually shaped around ignoring money; credit was, in high feudalism, seen as sinful. So when money and credit burst through the boundaries to create a market system, it felt like a revolution. Then, what gave the new system its energy was the discovery of a virtually unlimited source of free wealth in the Americas.
A combination of all these factors took a set of people who had been marginalized under feudalism – humanists, scientists, craftsmen, lawyers, radical preachers and bohemian playwrights such as Shakespeare – and put them at the head of a social transformation. At key moments, though tentatively at first, the state switched from hindering the change to promoting it.
Today, the thing that is corroding capitalism, barely rationalized by mainstream economics, is information. Most laws concerning information define the right of corporations to hoard it and the right of states to access it, irrespective of the human rights of citizens. The equivalent of the printing press and the scientific method is information technology and its spillover into all other technologies, from genetics to healthcare to agriculture to the movies, where it is quickly reducing costs.
The modern equivalent of the long stagnation of late feudalism is the stalled take-off of the third industrial revolution, where instead of rapidly automating work out of existence, we are reduced to creating what David Graeber calls “bullshit jobs” on low pay. And many economies are stagnating.
The equivalent of the new source of free wealth? It’s not exactly wealth: it’s the “externalities” – the free stuff and well being generated by networked interaction. It is the rise of non-market production, of unownable information, of peer networks and unmanaged enterprises. The internet, French economist Yann Moulier-Boutang says, is “both the ship and the ocean” when it comes to the modern equivalent of the discovery of the new world. In fact, it is the ship, the compass, the ocean and the gold.
The modern day external shocks are clear: energy depletion, climate change, ageing populations and migration. They are altering the dynamics of capitalism and making it unworkable in the long term. They have not yet had the same impact as the Black Death – but as we saw in New Orleans in 2005, it does not take the bubonic plague to destroy social order and functional infrastructure in a financially complex and impoverished society.
Once you understand the transition in this way, the need is not for a super-computed Five Year Plan – but a project, the aim of which should be to expand those technologies, business models and behaviors that dissolve market forces, socialize knowledge, eradicate the need for work and push the economy towards abundance. I call it Project Zero – because its aims are a zero-carbon-energy system; the production of machines, products and services with zero marginal costs; and the reduction of necessary work time as close as possible to zero.
Most 20th-century leftists believed that they did not have the luxury of a managed transition: it was an article of faith for them that nothing of the coming system could exist within the old one – though the working class always attempted to create an alternative life within and “despite” capitalism. As a result, once the possibility of a Soviet-style transition disappeared, the modern left became preoccupied simply with opposing things: the privatization of healthcare, anti-union laws, fracking – the list goes on.
If I am right, the logical focus for supporters of post-capitalism is to build alternatives within the system; to use governmental power in a radical and disruptive way; and to direct all actions towards the transition – not the defense of random elements of the old system. We have to learn what’s urgent, and what’s important, and that sometimes they do not coincide.
The power of imagination will become critical. In an information society, no thought, debate or dream is wasted – whether conceived in a tent camp, prison cell or the table football space of a startup company.
As with virtual manufacturing, in the transition to post-capitalism the work done at the design stage can reduce mistakes in the implementation stage. And the design of the post-capitalist world, as with software, can be modular. Different people can work on it in different places, at different speeds, with relative autonomy from each other. If I could summon one thing into existence for free it would be a global institution that modeled capitalism correctly: an open source model of the whole economy; official, grey and black. Every experiment run through it would enrich it; it would be open source and with as many data points as the most complex climate models.
The main contradiction today is between the possibility of free, abundant goods and information; and a system of monopolies, banks and governments trying to keep things private, scarce and commercial. Everything comes down to the struggle between the network and the hierarchy: between old forms of society moulded around capitalism and new forms of society that prefigure what comes next.
Is it utopian to believe we’re on the verge of an evolution beyond capitalism? We live in a world in which gay men and women can marry, and in which contraception has, within the space of 50 years, made the average working-class woman freer than the craziest libertine of the Bloomsbury era. Why do we, then, find it so hard to imagine economic freedom?
It is the elites – cut off in their dark-limo world – whose project looks as forlorn as that of the millennial sects of the 19th century. The democracy of riot squads, corrupt politicians, magnate-controlled newspapers and the surveillance state looks as phony and fragile as East Germany did 30 years ago.
All readings of human history have to allow for the possibility of a negative outcome. It haunts us in the zombie movie, the disaster movie, in the post-apocalyptic wasteland of films such as The Road or Elysium. But why should we not form a picture of the ideal life, built out of abundant information, non-hierarchical work and the dissociation of work from wages?
Millions of people are beginning to realize they have been sold a dream at odds with what reality can deliver. Their response is anger – and retreat towards national forms of capitalism that can only tear the world apart. Watching these emerge, from the pro-Grexit left factions in Syriza to the Front National and the isolationism of the American right has been like watching the nightmares we had during the Lehman Brothers crisis come true.
We need more than just a bunch of utopian dreams and small-scale horizontal projects. We need a project based on reason, evidence and testable designs, that cuts with the grain of history and is sustainable by the planet. And we need to get on with it.
The CDC and advocates for mandatory vaccination consistently repeat a dangerous mantra that finds no warranted basis in medical science. This monolithic industry, now a massive network of private and government institutions, state senates, and supported by a compliant media, want us to believe that science has finally settled the debate over vaccine safety and efficacy. All the data is in, so we are told, and no further research and discussion is necessary because vaccines have been officially ruled to pose no neurological and immunological risk to infants, children, pregnant mothers, adults and the elderly. This official policy is founded upon flawed premises and a primitive understanding about the complexities of the human body and its multifaceted immunological system.
This argument’s fallacy is actually quite simple. Valid science is never settled. The myth of “settled science,” which is especially endemic to the biological and medical sciences that rely on private financial interests, is sheer propaganda. Valid science, on the other hand, constantly seeks new discoveries to acquire further knowledge and greater understanding. The pursuit to fully comprehend the complexity of our biological, immunological and physiological systems, therefore, is in perpetual infinite regress. Today’s justifications for medical intervention, whether by drugs or vaccines, eventually become tomorrow’s barbarities as science further penetrates the hidden functions and operations of the human organism. Hence valid medical research should elicit new questions and not settle upon incomplete facts that are then proselytized as universal truths.
A medical science that refuses to ask new questions and settles upon disputed beliefs to sustain an industry’s financial portfolio is Scientism, a quasi-faith-based creed now institutionalized to promulgate repressive laws. These laws then advance Scientism’s authority. Unfortunately, today this accurately represents the sad state of vaccine research and vaccination policy. Modern vaccine science, and conventional medicine in general, has morphed into a new fascism, a rigid doctrine that has sacrificed the foundations of scientific integrity on the altar of institutional greed, privilege and profit.
During the past decade we have witnessed outbreaks of infectious disease among the fully vaccinated. We observe new viral strains appearing that escape current immunization. There are rising rates in autism and neurological disorders and increases in autoimmune conditions never before observed in large percentages of children. And there is a growing body of research pointing to vaccination’s adverse effects upon our immune systems. All of these trends, and many more, give sufficient reason to undertake a serious review of official claims over vaccine safety and efficacy. The evidence on the ground for the alarming rates in childhood illnesses parallel to the ever-increasing number of childhood vaccinations and the government’s ridiculous one-size-fits-all policy behind mass indiscriminate vaccination should convince us that vaccine safety is far from a settled matter.
The official CDC position on vaccines is that they are “unavoidably unsafe.” As New York University’s professor of law Mary Holland has repeatedly stated, the CDC can’t have it both ways. Vaccines cannot be simultaneously safe and unsafe. Yet, by mincing terms, spinning propaganda and misinterpreting and manipulating scientific research to whitewash vaccine’s life-threatening risks, this is what the government pressures parents to believe.
If we can accept the claim that vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe,” then the question is how unsafe are they? And now we possess an enormous body of yet to be challenged research, clinical trials, case examples of severe vaccine injury and court compensations paid out to families with vaccine-injured children to conclude that vaccine development has a very long way to go before a medically proven safe vaccine will ever be created. Unfortunately it is our opinion that this research is being ignored or at best marginalized by the most rabid CDC supporters and proponents of mass vaccination.
If the most compelling and thorough medical research indicates that there is no such thing as a safe vaccine, then what are we to make about those in the growing community opposing vaccination who demand safer vaccines while claiming to be pro-vaccine?
First we must acknowledge that all vaccines are “unavoidably unsafe” and this was a 2011 Supreme Court ruling in the Bruesewitz versus Wyeth case. Therefore all vaccines on the market are categorically unsafe. Perhaps in some distant future a vaccine, which remains only in the imagination of science fiction, will be developed to effectively and safely immunize against an infectious disease. So far, such a vaccine does not exist. Therefore, conscientious efforts to adhere to the precautionary principle and vigilant and consistent evaluation and reevaluation of the risks and benefits of vaccination is both essential and a human right that governments should encourage, protect and uphold.
The majority of vaccine ingredients have been shown repeatedly to have toxic consequences contributing to serious neurological and autoimmune conditions. These effects can be immediate, such as in the case of a child who undergoes seizures and is left with permanent neurological damage shortly after vaccination. Or effects through repeated vaccination can be accumulative and display symptoms many years later. In fact, there is very little scientific data, and nothing conclusive, about repeated vaccinations’ long term and accumulative immunosuppressive risks. The vaccine industry continues to rely upon outdated research, industry funded studies, conflicts of interest with federal agencies and even scientifically irrelevant data to make its case that vaccine additives and ingredients pose no medical risks. What the industry’s arsenal of research sorely lacks is biological and gold standard placebo controlled clinical trials to support this position. In short, accepted vaccine research is little more than junk science. And junk science can make for the best propaganda to convince a population into the deception of vaccine safety. Joseph Goebbels understood this all too well when he stated, “A lie told often enough, people will believe it, and you will even come to believe it yourself.”
For those who demand the removal of vaccines’ toxic ingredients yet remain pro-vaccine in principle, another and perhaps darker equation of vaccine risks is being ignored or seriously misunderstood. It is not simply the aluminum compounds, ethylmercury or thimerosal, Polysorbate 80, formaldehyde and other vaccine additives that are associated with vaccines’ portfolios of risks and adverse reactions, including those listed in every vaccine manufacturing and product insert and found in the National Institutes of Health Pubmed database of peer-reviewed medical literature. These compounds’ neurotoxic risks are well known and physicians, pediatricians, and scientists are increasingly being forced to acknowledge them and question the vaccine paradigm.
For example, any and every vaccine that contains aluminum, in any amount, is categorically unsafe regardless of a person’s age. This principle should be accepted as a biological and medical fact without question, yet pro-vaccinators deny it outright. In 2015, autoimmune disease researcher Dr. Yehuda Shoenfeld at Tel Aviv University published the definitive textbook on vaccines’ adverse effects that are now contributing to a wide variety of autoimmune diseases, including fibromyalgia, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, narcolepsy, connective tissue disease, rheumatoid arthritis, chronic fatigue syndrome, lupus, type 1 diabetes and a host of others. The majority of the 37 scientific papers in Shoenfeld’s Vaccines and Autoimmunity identify the adjuvant aluminum as a crucial culprit contributing to the epidemic rise in autoimmune disorders both in the US and abroad.
In mid-2014, concerns over aluminum adjuvants in vaccines, and the HPV vaccine in particular, reached the French Parliament for review. Unlike scientific committee reviews conducted in the US Congress, French politicians publicly weighed in carefully on the data behind the increase in HPV vaccine-injuries in order to rule on the benefits and risks of promoting the Gardasil and other vaccines containing aluminum. France has now established a precedent for the way other governments’ health officials and legislative bodies should address the growing questions toward vaccine safety.
Pro-vaccine political correctness is fundamentally based upon the faulty assumption that only known neurologically toxic ingredients, such as aluminum and mercury, need to be removed or replaced with safer compounds. There is no sound argument against the removal of these ingredients that will make vaccines safer. Federal agencies tell us that these toxic metals are in insufficient amounts to pose a toxicological risk and are readily expelled naturally by a child’s body. Although no amount of aluminum and mercury in any quantity has been proven absolutely safe, when an infant receives 3, 4 or more vaccinations during a single doctor’s visit, the amount of toxins introduced into its body mounts well above the EPA’s and FDA’s level of safety.
Fifteen years ago, the CDC’s argument may have been sufficient to increase confidence in today’s dominant vaccine paradigm. But science advances. Knowledge of the human genome, the emergence of the new science of epigenetics, and a deeper understanding of the body’s immunological activity is opening our horizons to a larger panorama of bio-molecular possibilities and the viral and bacterial activities that are forcing a growing number of scientists to conclude that we really don’t know as much about vaccination’s impact and risks upon the human organism as we previously thought.
If it can be ascertained that there are serious health risks from the viral and bacterial components that go into a vaccine and the genetic debris and contamination due to vaccine manufacturing’s primitive technology, then the removal of toxic chemicals is insufficient for safer vaccines. However one wishes to interpret it, vaccines introduce pathogens into the body. These pathogens interact with our body’s cells and DNA in known and unknown ways. Our medical understanding about host-pathogen interactions and viral epigenetics are adolescent. For example, in 2010, researchers from the National Brain Research Center in India reported that our scientific understanding of viral “mechanisms of epigenetic control of gene expression continues to baffle scholars.” Even what we know so far, the scientists conclude, “is still complete.” Evidence suggests that undesirable viral and genetic activity introduced through vaccines is contributing to the every-increasing infectious disease outbreaks among heavily vaccinated populations, such as the April 2016 mumps outbreak at Harvard University infecting over 40 students and the many pertussis outbreaks during the past several years. That is, infected persons are mostly fully vaccinated. Consequently, we are witnessing what European scientists warned in 2012, that viral epigenetic mechanisms are steadily evading our immune systems. Therefore, vaccines are increasingly becoming ineffective as new viral strains emerge and the length of immunity provided by vaccines are lessening.
The Human Genome Project ended less than two decades ago. Genomics’ new subdivision of epigenetics has only gained attention during the past ten to fifteen years. Already epigenetics is turning our earlier beliefs about DNA and genes upon its head. Barbara Lo Fisher summarizes epigenetics as “stimuli-triggered changes in gene expression that are inheritable and occur independent of changes to the underlying DNA sequence.” In other areas of epigenetic and toxicological research, other than vaccine science, there is greater acceptance of environmental factors’ affects upon our body’s DNA. It is now accepted that chemicals commonly found in every day products, such as the endocrine disruptive phthalates and bisphenol-A, are altering gene expression and creating havoc with normal hormonal activity. Food companies are increasingly becoming convinced that pesticides used in huge amounts on genetically modified crops are interfering with our bodies’ genes and are removing GMO ingredients from their products. High fructose corn syrup, processed sugar, and junk food are also becoming more widely accepted as genetic risks contributing to the dramatic increases in obesity, allergies and weakened immune systems.
Science still has very limited knowledge about how bacterial and viral genes interact with our own DNA, gene regulation, and individual genetic dispositions after being injected into the body. This remains a dark area of medical science that scientists are only recently beginning to dive deeper into. Therefore, current vaccine science, says Dr. Toni Bark, is “Frankenscience.” Doctors, physicians, CDC heads and health officials really have very little clear idea about what we are actually injecting into our children nor its long term consequences on our natural immune systems.
Back in 1971, University of Geneva scientists published a remarkable discovery in the journal World Medicine. According to their study foreign biological materials that enter directly into the blood stream can potentially become part of us and even combine with our own DNA. This activity known as “jumping genes,” and first postulated in the 1930s by Nobel laureate Barbara McClintock, still largely remains a mystery. These were some of the early precursory hypotheses and studies that would later become epigenetics.
Nevertheless, during the last dozen years biomedical and environmental research, which is unfailingly ignored and denied by the vaccine industry, is gradually mapping new terrains in our genetic understanding. Renowned British epigenetic researcher Dr. Mae-Wan Ho from the Institute of Science in Society has observed that “vaccines themselves can be dangerous, especially live, attenuated viral vaccines or the new recombinant nucleic acid vaccines; they have the potential to generate virulent viruses by recombination and the recombinant nucleic acids could cause autoimmune disease.” One day it will be conclusively shown that viral and bacterial vaccine components, as well as vaccines’ toxic chemicals, are fundamentally altering the human genome, weakening natural immunity that gives rise to autoimmune diseases, and directly contributing to both short and long term onset of debilitating life-threatening illnesses affecting millions of people throughout the world.
As we have noted, environmental medicine is diligently pursuing epigenetic investigations to better understand how exogenous chemicals and toxins affect the body’s immune system and genetic disposition. Simultaneously epigenetics remains an anathema within the vaccine industry. This is because epigenetics is the vaccine industry’s greatest threat and may well be the harbinger of vaccination’s collapse in the future. For that reason we increasingly observe the pro-vaccine community aggressively associating vaccine-injury illnesses with parental gene inheritance. Seeming vaccine injuries, the CDC informs us, are all due to inherited genes and are not stimulated by vaccine interference. More recently we are being told that genes associated with autism have always been present in the human genome. Yet, no one references the other body of research, such as a University of Montreal analysis, that has discovered the majority of these so-called autism genes are de novo. De novo genes are genetic mutations that appear for the first time in a parent’s germ cell or during the development of the fertilized egg itself. The most likely causal candidates accounting for de novo mutations are epigenetic. Consequently, a woman who is vaccinated during pregnancy will have her unborn child at a higher risk of de novo mutations due to the toxic stew of chemicals, additives and viruses she was injected with. In order to skirt the evidence supporting this scientifically plausible hypothesis, the CDC and its minions in the vaccine industry must continue to rely upon an older, determinist, and regressive view of genetics that denies epigenetic activity. Fortunately this outdated genetic paradigm is rapidly being deconstructed and proven unsound by other scientific disciplines.
Other examples are Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome or EDS (a connective tissue disorder) and Osteogenesis Imperfecta (a disorder characterized by brittle bones). Both conditions are known inherited genetic disorders and associated with a series of identifiable gene mutations. And both illnesses are increasing at an alarming rate among young children and adolescents.
In 2014, Dr. Lloyd Phillips conducted independent research to determine why so many young adolescent and teenage girls were rapidly coming down with more serious expressions of EDS. His findings concluded that these otherwise healthy girls carried an EDS genetic marker which remained dormant until shortly after receiving the HPV vaccine or Gardasil. 
A similar discovery was made by Dr. Robert Kendall Endres in 2009 who noted in 1962 there were approximately 10,000 cases of brittle bone syndrome worldwide. By 1978 there were 836,000 cases and over 4 million in 2000. This increase parallels the rapid increase in the number of vaccinations recommended in the CDC’s vaccine schedule and the WHO’s global vaccination initiatives. Although both disorders are associated with certain inherited gene mutations, the plausibility of vaccination as the triggering culprit responsible for their expression and activation cannot be ruled out. 
Any one of the many vaccines on the market today can cause enormous genetic and epigenetic disruption in any human being. Epidemiologists are puzzled about why some people according to plan for any given vaccine and why others don’t. For example, only 10% of people receiving the MMR vaccine generate high levels of measles antibodies following vaccination while another 10% don’t respond at all. Dr. Gregory Polland at Mayo’s Vaccine Research Group realizes this is undoubtedly due to genetic mutations and an individuals’ genetic code. The one-size-fits-all vaccination policy now advocated by the CDC and its leading spokespersons such as Paul Offit therefore has no rational and sound basis in science.
Since 1996, the CDC’s vaccine divisions and the World Health Organization (WHO) have known they have a very serious health problem with genetic contamination in every vaccine that relies upon animal cell culturing. This is a very dark side of the vaccine industry’s manufacturing methodology. The fact that genetic contamination, much which remains unknown and unidentified, is being injected into infants as young as 24 hours after birth receives absolutely no attention and is ignored by those who espouse political correctness on their pro-vaccine posturing.
In the past we have reported on the primitive methodology that vaccine makers still utilize to culture the viruses that go into vaccines. In 1999, the FDA convened a non-public regulatory meeting to review the health hazards of undesirable viral DNA fragments and protein contamination in all vaccines relying on animal cell culturing. Concerns were particularly focused upon vaccines using fertilized chicken eggs: the influenza, MMR and yellow fever vaccines. Among the most worrisome contaminants were prions (tiny proteins responsible for incurable diseases in both humans and animals), viral oncogenes capable of causing cancer, viral variants that might cause AIDS, and multiple known and unknown viruses present in the viruses’ culture medium. The executive scientists present acknowledged that recombination activity between viral codes and cells in the tissue culture is common and therefore the same can certainly occur in a child’s body after vaccination. Again, Barbara Lo Fisher warns that “because viruses are constantly mutating and recombining with each other and scientists do not understand how viruses and genes interact, it is clear that what is not known about the effects on human health of widespread use of live virus vaccines is far greater than what is known.”
Current vaccine technology makes it impossible to filter out all genetic contamination and DNA debris from vaccine preparations. Therefore the FDA has set weight limits on the amount of foreign genetic contamination permitted. Since vaccine manufacturers have been unable to meet these restrictions, the CDC has reduced the requirements to apply only to cancerous cell lines. Other DNA contamination allowances were increased one hundred fold. According to the FDA’s industry guidelines on vaccine production, the removal of foreign DNA and protein contamination from vaccines employing human and animal cell lines is a “non-binding recommendation.” A recent example of a vaccine temporarily removed from the market by the FDA is Glaxo’s rotavirus vaccine Rotarix. In 2010, an independent California laboratory identified a foreign pig virus, porcine circovirus 1 or PCV1, present in Rotarix. The CDC immediately reported that this contaminant posed no risks, although babies as young 2 months old were being vaccinated with this swine virus contaminant. The laboratory also found avian leukosis virus in the MMR vaccine and monkey retrovirus fragments in Paul Offit’s RotaTeq vaccine.
There are approximately 100 million allowable segments of DNA contamination permitted in any single vaccine dose. Much of this unwanted genetic and foreign protein rubbish has never been fully identified and sequenced. And vaccine makers are not required to identify what all of this genetic debris consists of. If a child follows the CDC’s recommended vaccination schedule from moments after birth until she or he reaches six years of age, 49 doses of 14 vaccines will have been administered. Isn’t it therefore time to pause and review the huge amount of DNA contamination, known and unknown viral genetic fragments children are receiving directly into their bloodstreams and ask whether or not this may be contributing to the enormous rise in childhood autoimmune conditions, including common adult diseases now frequently appearing in children
Dr. Howard Urnovitz is an immunologist trained at the University of Michigan and a leading advocate for informing scientists about vaccine-associated genetic mutations. He is perhaps best known for his research into genetic alterations among veterans suffering from Gulf War Syndrome. Although GWS has been associated with a wide range of toxic exposures, including chemical weapons, organophosphates, depleted uranium, an experimental anthrax vaccine, pesticides and other causes, Urnovitz’s discovery was singular. He identified genetic sequences in a particular chromosome well known as a “hot spot” for polymorphisms among many veterans. What was unusual was that the sequences were non-human and similar to the enteroviral segments from the oral polio vaccine administered to the veterans. Although this research cannot conclude that veteran’s GWS symptoms are directly related to the vaccine’s polio virus, it confirms the deep concern over viral genes introduced via vaccination jumping and recombining with our body’s DNA.
In light of the above discussions about gene jumping, recombination of pathogenic viral sequences merging with our bodies own DNA, undesirable mutations, and expression and activation of hereditary genetic predispositions leading to serious autoimmune complications and diseases, consider the following. Merck’s Rotateq vaccine for the protection of infants from rotavirus is a genetically engineered vaccine that includes five combined human and cow strains of rotavirus, first developed by Paul Offit at the Children’s Hospital of Pennsylvania. This viral concoction combines bovine rotavirus strains that causes diarrhea in cows with viral strains causing diarrhea in humans. This recombinant, engineered viral strain is then cultured on African Green Monkey kidney tissue. The seed stock that is later used to manufacture future lots of the vaccine also includes fetal bovine (cow) serum and porcine trypsin (an enzyme derived from a pig’s pancreas). Are we the only ones who share grave trepidations that an infant will receive a series of 3 rotavirus injections by the age of six months? And we are to believe that it is normal and safe for an infant to be unnaturally exposed to an artificial and abnormal pathogen in this manner?
The genetically engineered rotavirus vaccines, similar to many of the newer vaccines positioned to come on the market in the very near future, contain an attenuated live virus. These vaccines are already raising serious questions about their influential impact upon the vitality of the immune system, our bodies’ gut microbiome and the even environmental ecologies. In 2012, Norwegian scientists are the University of Tromso concluded that “genetically engineered or modified viruses (GMVs) are being increasingly used as live vaccine vectors and their applications may have environmental implications…. In all cases there may be circumstances that enable GMVs to jump species barriers directly, or following recombination with naturally occurring viruses.”
Finally, the CDC aggressively follows a one-size-fits-all policy in its efforts to keep the entire American population vaccinated. Today there are over two hundred new vaccines in the pipeline and eventually coming to market. As new spikes in diseases occur consistently with each new vaccine approved and entered in the CDC’s recommended vaccination schedule, so also will other disease conditions increase as well as new disorders never observed before. Americans today are less healthy than previous generations. More and more people have compromised immune systems and are rapidly becoming immunodeficient. Surprisingly no federal agency or official institution tries to track the total number of Americans with serious compromised immune systems other than recipient of organ transplants, cancer or positive HIV diagnoses. The American Autoimmune Related Diseases Associations estimates that 50 million people have any one of 100 and perhaps over 140 different life-threatening autoimmune diseases. The American Cancer Society reports 1.6 new cancer cases annually and rising. Federal health officials downplay the severity of this epidemic by only counting 24 autoimmune diseases.
In addition, poverty is on the rise and conservative estimates record 22% of all children living below the poverty level. Forty eight million Americans live in insecure food households and are clinically malnourished. This too is contributing to the increase in weakened immune systems and diseases. Other health disorders such as chronic lack of sleep, stress, and anxiety are now be associated with weakened immunity and candidates for immunosuppressive disorders. All told, anywhere between 30-50 percent of Americans have weakened immune systems that make them far more susceptible to adverse complications due to vaccines. And live attenuated virus vaccines, which include measles, mumps, rubella, influenza, rotavirus, chickenpox, smallpox, and the live polio vaccine in foreign countries have been shown repeatedly to weaken natural immunity and make the recipient more predisposed to other viral infections.
It is essential that we accept that the science and technology to support vaccine safety remains in its infancy. For those vaccine developers who are looking at vaccination’s epigenetic effects on the human genome, our bodies’ microbiome, and the immune system new and unexpected concerns over safety are coming to light. Moreover, no one is a greater expert on a child’s reaction to a vaccine than a parent. But most parents don’t have the scientific background to advocate for vaccine-induced injuries. Nor do the physicians, pediatricians, nurses and pharmacists who oversee vaccination have the time and specialized medical training to fully understand each and every vaccine’s immunological and genetic complexities. Consequently, the official doctrine of vaccine safety is completely based upon blind belief and faith. Yet medical interventions imposed and mandated on the public should be based solely on scientific proof of safety, and the pro-vaccine industry and federal authorities have never convincingly made their case based on gold standard scientific principles. Until the vaccine industry does so, no child’s or adult’s life should ever be put at unnecessary risk.
Richard Gale is the Executive Producer of the Progressive Radio Network and a former Senior Research Analyst in the biotechnology and genomic industries. Dr. Gary Null is the host of the nation’s longest running public radio program on nutrition and natural health and a multi-award-winning documentary film director, including Autism: Made in the USA, War on Health: The FDA’s Cult of Tyranny and Silent Epidemic: The Untold Story of Vaccination.
 Habakus L and Holland M, Vaccine Epidemic. Skyhorse Press, New York 2012
 Bruesewitz et al vs Wyeth LLC. http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/09-152.pdf
 Shoenfeld Y, Agmon-Levin N. Vaccines and Autoimmunity. San Francisco: Wiley, 2015
 “France: Aluminum Adjuvants and HPV Vaccines Up for Debate.” http://sanevax.org/france-aluminum-adjuvants-hpv-vaccines-debate/
 Fisher, BL. “Emerging Risks of Live Virus and Virus Vectored Vaccines,” National Vaccination Information Center, 2014
 Fisher BL. Ibid.
 Null, G. Silent Epidemic: The Untold Story of Vaccines (documentary film), 2013
 Ho M-W. “The vaccines are far more deadly than the swine flu,” Institute of Science in Society, July 27, 2009
 Gale R and Null G. “Vaccines Dark Inferno: What is Not on Insert Labels.” September 28, 2009. http://blog.garynull.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/VaccinesDarkInferno2.pdf
 Gale R and Null G. Ibid
 Fisher, BL. “Emerging Risks of Live Virus and Virus Vectored Vaccines,” National Vaccination Information Center, 2014
 Gale R and Null G. Ibid
 Buttram H. “Vaccines and Genetic Mutation,” October 11, 2002 http://www.whale.to/a/yurko.html
 Schall T. “How many Americans are immunocompromised,” Bioethics Bulletin. February 11, 2015
Breaking: Courts Discreetly Confirm MMR Vaccine Causes Autism